Tag Archives: psychology

Tagore and Psychosynthesis: 5 Fun Facts

May 7th is the 164th birthday of Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941), the Bengali poet and Nobel Prize winner of Literature in 1913. Tagore’s ability to live a rich and fully creative life remains an inspiration. Poet, author of novels and short stories, lecturer, essayist, playwriter, song writer, founder of three educational institutions, and – during the last ten years of his life – painter, Tagore’s creative approach to being in the world provides us with a model of what it means to be fully human and in relationship to everything around us.

Roberto Assagioli met Tagore in the late spring of 1926 during Tagore’s third visit to Italy. Upon their meeting in Rome, we can easily imagine the younger Italian psychiatrist’s enthusiasm for the great Bengali poet and musician. Besides being world-famous, Tagore was Assagioli’s senior by twenty-seven years, possibly evoking feelings in the latter of meeting a spiritual father.

To celebrate today, here are five fun facts about Tagore and psychosynthesis.

1. Tagore as an Ideal Model

Note from Assagioli’s Archives.

Assagioli referred to Tagore as an example of someone who has completed the process of psychosynthesis and notes that Dante’s Divine Comedy and Tagore’s writings are both testimonies of superconscious exploration. Assagioli also suggested Tagore might act as an ‘Ideal Model’ for persons seeking psychosynthesis.

Assagioli was not alone in recognizing Tagore’s wholeness as a human being. Throughout Tagore’s lifetime, many people referred to him with the appellation of ‘Gurdeva’, meaning ‘revered teacher’, a title bestowed upon him by Gandhi. Sisir Kumar Ghose (1840-1911) described Tagore as a “complete man,” and writer and poet Richard Church (1893-1972) entitled his essay about Tagore “The Universal Man”, in which he described Tagore as “an example of a harmonious man… guided from the beginning by a direct and unquestioning vision which led him toward a philosophy of wholeness, of unity.”

2. Tagore Balanced and Synthesized Polarities

Balancing polar energies is essential to psychosynthesis. Tagore clearly recognized the opposition of forces in all of creation and even in his own poetry, writing, “If the divergence is too wide, or the unison too close, there is … no room for poetry. Where the pain of discord strives to attain and express its resolution into harmony, then does poetry break forth into music.” Tagore demonstrated unity in opposites not only in his poetry but also in other areas of his life. For example, his desire to create Visva-Bharati University could be seen as a place where the opposite poles of Eastern and Western thought, culture, and religion could converge, harmonize, and synthesize into a higher level of spiritual unity.

3. Tagore Wrote About His Subpersonalities

One could say that Tagore’s authentic ‘I’ – the times when he felt most free, joyful and himself – was when he was writing poetry. However, Tagore often felt inwardly torn between himself as a poet and his conflicting subpersonalities (although he did not name them as such). In 1921 Tagore wrote: “Sometimes it amuses me to see the struggle for supremacy that is going on between the different persons within me.”

Throughout his lifetime, Tagore would struggle to integrate and ultimately synthesize his numerous subpersonalities into an authentic whole. In his letters to Charles Freer Andrews, Tagore often described the Poet within him in conflict with such inner persons as: The Preacher, Politician, Patriot, Teacher, Leader, the man who is Good, and the Prophet. In one letter he described a number of these subpersonalities having a conversation.

At the end of his life, Tagore produced ten to twelve self-portraits as ink drawings or paintings, all of which reflected his inner self. Each self-portrait is uniquely different from the others, perhaps an expression of his subpersonalities. Tagore painted or drew his facial expressions to show everything from anxiety to apprehension, from wonder to feelings of pain, sorrow, grief and ridicule towards power.

4. Tagore Described His Transpersonal Experiences

Tagore described moments when he was able to touch the Infinite and become intensely conscious of it through the illumination of joy. While Tagore did not specifically name such incidences as ‘transpersonal experiences’, he described them as “a sudden spiritual outburst from within me, which was like the underground current of a perennial stream, unexpectedly welling up on the surface.” In his book The Religion of Man, he also recognized the “realization of transcendental consciousness accompanied by a perfect sense of bliss… carrying in it the positive evidence which cannot be denied by any negative argument of refutation.” He then asserted that, while not a religion per se, such a union of one’s being with the Infinite was “valuable as a great psychological experience” (my emphasis).

One of Tagore’s earliest transpersonal experiences occurred when he was a primary school student struggling with his spelling lessons. He described how the writing appeared to him as “irrelevant marks, smudges and gaps, wearisome in its moth-eaten meaninglessness.” But then he came upon a rhymed sentence, roughly translated into English as ‘It rains, the leaves tremble’. Upon reading this sentence, Tagore was suddenly transported beyond the classroom:

“The unmeaning fragments lost their individual isolation and my mind revelled in the unity of a vision… I felt sure that some Being who comprehended me and my world was seeking his best expression in all my experiences, uniting them into an ever-widening individuality which is a spiritual work of art.”

5. Tagore and Assagioli had Similar Spiritual Philosophies

Potraits of Tagore and Assagioli by Alan C. Haras

Although Tagore and Assagioli came from different cultural and linguistic inheritances, both of their spiritual philosophies underwent a similar evolutionary process. In particular, they shared a vision of how the Infinite is expressed through the finite individual. What is perhaps most striking when comparing both men’s philosophies is that, despite their unique experiences and diverse cultural heritages and backgrounds, each managed to integrate his experiences with his knowledge of various cultural sources and spiritual traditions to synthesize a visionary understanding of the transcendental personality of humankind.

You can read more about their shared spiritual philosophy in my published article: “The Eternal Stranger Calls”: The Spiritual Philosophies of Rabindranath Tagore and Roberto Assagioli”  published in the Journal of Indian Philosophy and Religion.

Conclusion

As far as we know, Tagore was not familiar with psychosynthesis psychology, however, many of his visionary ideals and life experiences as expressed in his literary works, songs, and paintings easily correspond to many of its concepts. Undoubtedly, Tagore does provide us with an excellent example of someone who has accomplished the long process of psychosynthesis, both personal and spiritual.


Happy Birthday Rabindranath Tagore!


Many thanks to Ruchira Chakravarty for encouraging me to write this blog.

Assagioli’s Wartime Shechinah

While many of us are feeling overwhelmed by the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza of late, there are actually 127 armed conflicts taking place in the world today. Most of these conflicts do not make the headlines. Some of them started recently, while others have lasted for more than 50 years.

So I thought it might be a good time to share this story about a spiritual experience that Roberto Assagioli had during wartime. He called it a shechinah and declared that it was one of the ‘high water marks’ of his spiritual life. You can read about his experience below in both English and Italian. My hope is that his story reminds us that the Higher Self exists in all of us, everywhere, at all times.

Note from Assagioli’s Archives:

Scehinah (da sciahèn, dimorare) / Scehinah è il “Dio immanente”, lo spirito divino che è nel mondo, “Dio che è in noi”. / Il Talmud, Pref. p. XVIII (Doc #17591, Istituto di Psicosintesi, Florence).

Scehinah (from sciahèn, dwell) / Scehinah is the “immanent God,” the divine spirit that is in the world, “God who is in us.” / The Talmud, Pref. p. XVIII

Assagioli’s Russian and Ukrainian Contacts

Today is Roberto Assagioli’s 136th birthday. So I thought this might be a good time to explore what we know about his time in Russia and his relationship with a Ukrainian couple whom he knew in Rome.

Assagioli’s Trip to Russia in 1911

The Kremlin, Moscow early 1900s

We have Assagioli’s own account of his visit to Russia in 1911.[i] At that time, Russia was a constitutional monarchy and in great political turmoil. Assagioli tells how during his time in Moscow, he managed to engage both with the aristocrats associated with the Italian embassy and revolutionary students. He said:

“I saw it was very evident that the whole regime was corrupt and impossible, and on the verge of cracking.”

Learning Russian and Understanding the Russian Psyche

But let’s start at the beginning… In his autobiography, he talks about helping Vera Mitrofanovna Bogrova (c. 1890-?) obtain an illegal Italian passport. She was a social revolutionary (as opposed to a ‘communist’) who had been released from Russian prison and had escaped to Florence. She was chief of the Russian organization of revolutionary medical students.

Needing to finish her medical degree, she enrolled in the university in Florence. That’s where Roberto and Vera met and became good friends. Assagioli and Madame Bogrova would sit together in the back of anatomy classes so he could practice speaking Russian. He also recounts that she introduced him to Slavic psychology. (In a note from his archives, Assagioli suggests reading Edgar Wallace’s novel The Book of All Power in order to understand Russian psychology.)

But Bogrova found Florentine life boring and longed to return to Russia to join her husband and continue her work in the revolution. Assagioli thought she was a bit crazy to return, but then helped her obtain the passport. “You go there,” he said, “and if you’re not caught, I’ll come to Russia.”

The writer Dora Melegari was a friend of Assagioli’s. Her brother was the Italian Ambassador to Russia in 1911.

Bogrova did return to Moscow under the guise of being Italian and managed to evade detection. She was soon able to reunite with her husband, posing as his Italian lover! So that summer, Assagioli traveled to Moscow. He was friends with the Italian writer Dora Melegari (1849-1924) who was the sister of the Italian ambassador

(1854-1935). Hence, his access to the ambassador who was located in St. Petersburg.

Just a brief tangent to say the Dora Melegari played a leading role in the founding of the National Council of Italian Women (CNDI) in 1903 and in its First National Congress in 1908. This is the same organization founded by Contessa Gabriella Spalletti Rasponi (1853-1931) who was the first President of the Institution of Psychosynthesis.

Helping a Damsel in Distress

Russian philosopher Nikolai Lossky. Assagioli attended his lecture while in Moscow.

Okay, now back to Moscow. While there, Assagioli introduced himself as a medical student and attended the first Meeting of the Russian Union of Psychiatrists and Neuropathologists. He also attended a lecture by Nikolai Onufrievich Lossky (1870–1965), a Russian philosopher who promoted evolutionary metaphysics of reincarnation.

One September morning, Bogrova entered her friend’s apartment where Assagioli was staying and said, “Hurry up! Get up! My cousin has murdered the Prime Minister.” The assassin was actually her brother-in-law Dmitrii Bogrov (1887-1911). He had killed Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin (1862-1911) during an opera theatre performance in Kiev in the presence of the tsar and his eldest daughters.

Mystery Murder

No one is certain to this day why Bogrov (above right) killed Stolypin (above left). Assagioli also discusses the possible reasons. Some say Bogrov was influenced by conservative monarchists who were opposed to Stolypin’s reforms and his influence on the tsar. Others say Bogrov was a revolutionary planted inside Stolypin’s circle of secret police in order to kill him. There is the theory that the police wanted Stolypin dead because he was trying to clean up police corruption. Another theory is that Bogrov was being pressured by the revolutionaries to kill Stolypin in order to prove his alliance to them. Still others say that, as a Jew, Bogrov was taking revenge for the recent Russian pogroms. Who knows what combination of reasons he might have had?

Cover of the Neurology Bulletin 1911.

In any case, Assagioli once again came to the rescue of Madame Bogrova. Being a relative of the assassin, she was afraid of being arrested. At one point, Assagioli accompanied her to the Italian Consul in Moscow, telling her not to speak of word of Italian, for her accent would give her true nationality away. By this time it was October, and Assagioli soon took a train back to Florence. Bogrova disappeared. He never saw her again.

More to Investigate!

If anyone lives near Columbia University, you might consider making an appointment to visit the Rare Book and Manuscript Library. There you can view the Vera Mitrofanovna Bogrova Papers. Included are her manuscript memoirs (in Russian), which deal with such topics as her childhood, the Bogrov family, the Russian revolutionary movement, and the “Jewish Question” in Russia (she was Jewish). There are also three documents relating to Grigoii Girgor’evich Bogrov, Bogrova’s father-in-law and the father of the assassin Dimitrii Bogrov.

Who knows if she mentions Assagioli and can collaborate his story?

Assagioli’s Stay with Nina Onatsky, Ukrainian Nationalist

Now let’s jump ahead thirty years to 1940. Once released from Regina Coeli prison, Assagioli wrote in Freedom in Jail that he gave up his apartment in Rome and found a “friendly refuge: N.O.’s pension”. We now know that N.O. was Nina Onatsky. But who was she? I spent a day on the internet trying to find out, and I virtually ended up in the Elmer L. Andersen Library at the University of Minnesota.

Ukrainian delegation at the International Women’s Congress in Rome in 1923. Nina Onatsky is on the right.

Nina was the wife of Evhen Onatsky (1984-1979), an Ukrainian, who at the time of Assagioli’s release was teaching Ukrainian language at the University of Rome. Nina was “a very noble and refined lady,” university graduate and ran the pensione in order to raise money for her husband’s publications.[2]

Who was Evhen Onatsky?

In 1943, E. Onatsky was also thrown into Regina Coeli prison! And so the plot thickens…

Evhen Onatsky

Political activist, historian, journalist and diplomat, Onatsky played a major role during the Russian Revolution in 1917, which earned him a high ranking post in Ukrainian politics. He came to Italy in 1920 as chief of the Ukrainian Press Bureau. Only 26 years old, he was fluent in Italian when he arrived. But then in 1923, the government of Ukraine was overthrown by the Russian communist regime. At that point, Onatzky became a member of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), an international political organization that believed in violently overthrowing Soviet Russia for Ukrainian independence.

At the start of WWII, Onatsky and the OUN was pro-German, hoping that the Germans would help the Ukrainians defeat Russian rule. About the time he must have known Assagioli, Onatsky was writing pro-Nazi and anti-Semitic material (under a pseudonym) for the Germans. He was also secretly acting as a political advisor for the head of the OUN, who the Germans persecuted. Onatsky then secretly became the new OUN leader.

ukrainian slovo (Paris)

La Parole ukrainienne (Ukrainian Word), a weekly newspaper closely allied with the OUN. It serves as an unofficial organ of the Leadership of Ukrainian Nationalists. As a prominent figure, Evhen Onatsky often wrote for this newspaper.

Once Onatsky realized that the Germans had no intention of returning Ukraine to the Ukrainians, he switched sides and that’s when the Germans jailed him, later sending him off to Berlin and Oranienburg prison camps.

In 1945, Onatsky was freed from jail and returned to Rome. Supported by the Americans of Ukrainian descent, he took charge of the Ukrainian-American Relief Committee in Italy. After two years, he and Nina migrated to Argentina where they lived out their years in Buenos Aires. Among the Ukrainian community, Onatsky become a well-known Ukrainian scholar and folklorist.

But the story doesn’t end there! It’s amazing what you can find on the Internet… While in Argentina, he was investigated by the CIA for his anti-communist activities. You can read his declassified CIA file here.

Meanwhile, if you live near the University of Minnesota, you might like to visit the Elmer L. Andersen Library and look through its Evhen Onatsky collection. They have 46 boxes of material including correspondence with Benito Mussolini.

Note from Assagioli’s Archives: “Non esistono problemi!” (Problems don’t exists!) / Nina Onatsky

So we can see from both stories, that in war, there are often no clear cut sides. People have all kinds of agendas, alliances, and wills of their own. (Tolstoy writes about this brilliantly in War and Peace.) Life is complex and the people and their desires even more so.


Happy Birthday Roberto!


[i] See Roberto Assagioli, Roberto Assagioli in his own words, Fragments of an autobiography (recorded by E. Smith – edited by G. Dattilo, P. Ferrucci, V. Reid Ferrucci), Firenze 2019, Istituto di Psicosintesi, pp. 38-44.

[ii]. Autobiography of Anthony Hlynka (trans.), printed in Oleh W. Gerus and Denis Hlynka, ed., The Honourable Member for Vegreville: The Memoirs and Diary of Anthony Hlynka, MP, Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 2005, pp. 127-128.