Category Archives: Relationship

Assagioli’s Russian and Ukrainian Contacts

Today is Roberto Assagioli’s 136th birthday. So I thought this might be a good time to explore what we know about his time in Russia and his relationship with a Ukrainian couple whom he knew in Rome.

Assagioli’s Trip to Russia in 1911

The Kremlin, Moscow early 1900s

We have Assagioli’s own account of his visit to Russia in 1911.[i] At that time, Russia was a constitutional monarchy and in great political turmoil. Assagioli tells how during his time in Moscow, he managed to engage both with the aristocrats associated with the Italian embassy and revolutionary students. He said:

“I saw it was very evident that the whole regime was corrupt and impossible, and on the verge of cracking.”

Learning Russian and Understanding the Russian Psyche

But let’s start at the beginning… In his autobiography, he talks about helping Vera Mitrofanovna Bogrova (c. 1890-?) obtain an illegal Italian passport. She was a social revolutionary (as opposed to a ‘communist’) who had been released from Russian prison and had escaped to Florence. She was chief of the Russian organization of revolutionary medical students.

Needing to finish her medical degree, she enrolled in the university in Florence. That’s where Roberto and Vera met and became good friends. Assagioli and Madame Bogrova would sit together in the back of anatomy classes so he could practice speaking Russian. He also recounts that she introduced him to Slavic psychology. (In a note from his archives, Assagioli suggests reading Edgar Wallace’s novel The Book of All Power in order to understand Russian psychology.)

But Bogrova found Florentine life boring and longed to return to Russia to join her husband and continue her work in the revolution. Assagioli thought she was a bit crazy to return, but then helped her obtain the passport. “You go there,” he said, “and if you’re not caught, I’ll come to Russia.”

The writer Dora Melegari was a friend of Assagioli’s. Her brother was the Italian Ambassador to Russia in 1911.

Bogrova did return to Moscow under the guise of being Italian and managed to evade detection. She was soon able to reunite with her husband, posing as his Italian lover! So that summer, Assagioli traveled to Moscow. He was friends with the Italian writer Dora Melegari (1849-1924) who was the sister of the Italian ambassador

(1854-1935). Hence, his access to the ambassador who was located in St. Petersburg.

Just a brief tangent to say the Dora Melegari played a leading role in the founding of the National Council of Italian Women (CNDI) in 1903 and in its First National Congress in 1908. This is the same organization founded by Contessa Gabriella Spalletti Rasponi (1853-1931) who was the first President of the Institution of Psychosynthesis.

Helping a Damsel in Distress

Russian philosopher Nikolai Lossky. Assagioli attended his lecture while in Moscow.

Okay, now back to Moscow. While there, Assagioli introduced himself as a medical student and attended the first Meeting of the Russian Union of Psychiatrists and Neuropathologists. He also attended a lecture by Nikolai Onufrievich Lossky (1870–1965), a Russian philosopher who promoted evolutionary metaphysics of reincarnation.

One September morning, Bogrova entered her friend’s apartment where Assagioli was staying and said, “Hurry up! Get up! My cousin has murdered the Prime Minister.” The assassin was actually her brother-in-law Dmitrii Bogrov (1887-1911). He had killed Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin (1862-1911) during an opera theatre performance in Kiev in the presence of the tsar and his eldest daughters.

Mystery Murder

No one is certain to this day why Bogrov (above right) killed Stolypin (above left). Assagioli also discusses the possible reasons. Some say Bogrov was influenced by conservative monarchists who were opposed to Stolypin’s reforms and his influence on the tsar. Others say Bogrov was a revolutionary planted inside Stolypin’s circle of secret police in order to kill him. There is the theory that the police wanted Stolypin dead because he was trying to clean up police corruption. Another theory is that Bogrov was being pressured by the revolutionaries to kill Stolypin in order to prove his alliance to them. Still others say that, as a Jew, Bogrov was taking revenge for the recent Russian pogroms. Who knows what combination of reasons he might have had?

Cover of the Neurology Bulletin 1911.

In any case, Assagioli once again came to the rescue of Madame Bogrova. Being a relative of the assassin, she was afraid of being arrested. At one point, Assagioli accompanied her to the Italian Consul in Moscow, telling her not to speak of word of Italian, for her accent would give her true nationality away. By this time it was October, and Assagioli soon took a train back to Florence. Bogrova disappeared. He never saw her again.

More to Investigate!

If anyone lives near Columbia University, you might consider making an appointment to visit the Rare Book and Manuscript Library. There you can view the Vera Mitrofanovna Bogrova Papers. Included are her manuscript memoirs (in Russian), which deal with such topics as her childhood, the Bogrov family, the Russian revolutionary movement, and the “Jewish Question” in Russia (she was Jewish). There are also three documents relating to Grigoii Girgor’evich Bogrov, Bogrova’s father-in-law and the father of the assassin Dimitrii Bogrov.

Who knows if she mentions Assagioli and can collaborate his story?

Assagioli’s Stay with Nina Onatsky, Ukrainian Nationalist

Now let’s jump ahead thirty years to 1940. Once released from Regina Coeli prison, Assagioli wrote in Freedom in Jail that he gave up his apartment in Rome and found a “friendly refuge: N.O.’s pension”. We now know that N.O. was Nina Onatsky. But who was she? I spent a day on the internet trying to find out, and I virtually ended up in the Elmer L. Andersen Library at the University of Minnesota.

Ukrainian delegation at the International Women’s Congress in Rome in 1923. Nina Onatsky is on the right.

Nina was the wife of Evhen Onatsky (1984-1979), an Ukrainian, who at the time of Assagioli’s release was teaching Ukrainian language at the University of Rome. Nina was “a very noble and refined lady,” university graduate and ran the pensione in order to raise money for her husband’s publications.[2]

Who was Evhen Onatsky?

In 1943, E. Onatsky was also thrown into Regina Coeli prison! And so the plot thickens…

Evhen Onatsky

Political activist, historian, journalist and diplomat, Onatsky played a major role during the Russian Revolution in 1917, which earned him a high ranking post in Ukrainian politics. He came to Italy in 1920 as chief of the Ukrainian Press Bureau. Only 26 years old, he was fluent in Italian when he arrived. But then in 1923, the government of Ukraine was overthrown by the Russian communist regime. At that point, Onatzky became a member of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), an international political organization that believed in violently overthrowing Soviet Russia for Ukrainian independence.

At the start of WWII, Onatsky and the OUN was pro-German, hoping that the Germans would help the Ukrainians defeat Russian rule. About the time he must have known Assagioli, Onatsky was writing pro-Nazi and anti-Semitic material (under a pseudonym) for the Germans. He was also secretly acting as a political advisor for the head of the OUN, who the Germans persecuted. Onatsky then secretly became the new OUN leader.

ukrainian slovo (Paris)

La Parole ukrainienne (Ukrainian Word), a weekly newspaper closely allied with the OUN. It serves as an unofficial organ of the Leadership of Ukrainian Nationalists. As a prominent figure, Evhen Onatsky often wrote for this newspaper.

Once Onatsky realized that the Germans had no intention of returning Ukraine to the Ukrainians, he switched sides and that’s when the Germans jailed him, later sending him off to Berlin and Oranienburg prison camps.

In 1945, Onatsky was freed from jail and returned to Rome. Supported by the Americans of Ukrainian descent, he took charge of the Ukrainian-American Relief Committee in Italy. After two years, he and Nina migrated to Argentina where they lived out their years in Buenos Aires. Among the Ukrainian community, Onatsky become a well-known Ukrainian scholar and folklorist.

But the story doesn’t end there! It’s amazing what you can find on the Internet… While in Argentina, he was investigated by the CIA for his anti-communist activities. You can read his declassified CIA file here.

Meanwhile, if you live near the University of Minnesota, you might like to visit the Elmer L. Andersen Library and look through its Evhen Onatsky collection. They have 46 boxes of material including correspondence with Benito Mussolini.

Note from Assagioli’s Archives: “Non esistono problemi!” (Problems don’t exists!) / Nina Onatsky

So we can see from both stories, that in war, there are often no clear cut sides. People have all kinds of agendas, alliances, and wills of their own. (Tolstoy writes about this brilliantly in War and Peace.) Life is complex and the people and their desires even more so.


Happy Birthday Roberto!


[i] See Roberto Assagioli, Roberto Assagioli in his own words, Fragments of an autobiography (recorded by E. Smith – edited by G. Dattilo, P. Ferrucci, V. Reid Ferrucci), Firenze 2019, Istituto di Psicosintesi, pp. 38-44.

[ii]. Autobiography of Anthony Hlynka (trans.), printed in Oleh W. Gerus and Denis Hlynka, ed., The Honourable Member for Vegreville: The Memoirs and Diary of Anthony Hlynka, MP, Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 2005, pp. 127-128.

Where is the Peace?

It seems as if ‘Peace’ has become a dirty word.

There is talk of a ceasefire, humanitarian pause, resolutions, and emergency joint summits. But Peace? Where is the Peace?

I have been searching for peace for a long time. Both inside and out. Longing for peace, I sometimes to go to Assisi, also known as the City of Peace (near my home), just to ring the Peace Bell.

Not far from the Basilica of San Francesco, the Peace Bell is outside of the old walls of the city in the nearby woods. The bell is held aloft by four granite columns, each representing a different religion: Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and Buddhism. Designed by German artist Gerhard Kadletz, the bell is named Regina Pacis (Queen of Peace) and it unites the four religions to announce peace with one voice.

Inaugurated in 2007, the Peace Bell’s official song is “Numquam. Renascantum. Uis. Bellum. Terror.” (Never again violence. Never again war. Never again terror.) This declaration is inscribed on the lower edge of the bell along with the signatures of four religious leaders: Cardinal Ratzinger who later became Pope Benedict XVI; His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama; Ali Gomaa, the Gran Mufti of Egypt; and Chief Rabbi of Israel, Jona Metzger.

The Author rings the bell with artist Gerhard Kadletz and Brother Thomas.

When rung, the sweet message of the Peace Bell resounds across the town and out into the world.

This Peace Bell should be ringing 24/7!

Unbind our Hearts to Ring Out Peace

Gerhard Kadletz, the artist who created the Peace Bell, recently completed another work, entitled Wo ist der Frieden? (Where is the Peace?).

Mr. Kadletz’s new bell is an exact replica of the Peace Bell in Assisi. However, he has deliberately silenced his new bell. This bell is tightly wound with barbed wire from the Ganacker concentration camp in Germany. The bell itself precariously hangs on a 10,000-year-old bog oak that is partially charred. And the clapper is tightly tied with rope so the bell can not be rung.

May this work of art remind us of our responsibility to radiate and be disciples of peace. Peace doesn’t just happen. It requires us to engage with it, to be in relationship with it. Just as we have to pull the cord to ring the Peace Bell, so must we pull the cords of our broken heartstrings and work towards peace within. We must unwrap the barbed wire entwined around the our inner Peace Bell and unbind the rope that holds fast our clapper from connecting with the bell.

Angels are Waiting to Help Us

We can call on the multitude of angels around to help us. They are often hanging about, just waiting for us to ask for their assistance. In a Umbrian sanctuary near my home is a beautiful 15th-century fresco of the Archangel Saint Michael. He is the only angel mentioned by name in the Torah (Judaism), Bible (Christianity), and Qur’an (Islam). In all of three faiths, believers consider Michael an angel who fights evil with the power of good. Hence he is often depicted with a sword. During the time this sanctuary was built, the Archangel Saint Michael would have been seen as a protector of soldiers, as the angel that accompanies their souls to heaven, and as a healer. In fact, the sanctuary is built near a spring and its waters are said to have therapeutic properties.

In this fresco, we see the Archangel Saint Michael with his wings over two armed soldiers. The Archangel unites them in a gentle embrace, as they, in turn, embrace and kiss each other in reconciliation. It is said that centuries ago, one day a year, nearby warring factions would come to this sanctuary to reconcile their differences.

Let us Arrive at a Fruitful, Dynamic and Constructive Peace

I will leave you with a few thoughts of Assagioli from his article “May the Spirit of Peace Spread Everywhere”:

Two Islamic angels write in the Book of Life, suggesting angels’ ongoing and attentive interest in human affairs (1280 A.D., Iraq)

“The Angel of Peace wraps the whole world in its big white wings…

“Some people may be helped along by the image of a big Angel, with white wings, which emanates streams of peace, spreading waves of Peace throughout ourselves, our country, the whole Earth, the human race.

“Real Peace is a peak to climb, an ideal to conquer, a point of arrival.

“True Peace has to remain steadfast before evil, in times of pain, during emotional reactions, in the midst of any kind of assault, in the face of any loss, defeat or separation.

“True Peace coexists with inner personal suffering. It is not a mood of  joyfulness and delight; it produces a double life inside ourselves, till the moment when our personality appears completely regenerated, so that the inner Peace will become incarnated and the whole being permeated through PEACE, transformed into PEACE.”

Yoko Ono displayed her message “Imagine Peace” in London, Berlin,
Los Angeles, Melbourne, Milan, New York and Seoul (2022).

Assagioli and Jung: Reflections on their Relationship (Part II)

Today marks the 148th birthday of Carl Gustav Jung. This is the second part of a three part series that explores psychosynthesis and Jungian analysis based on my article Psychosynthesis and Jung in a Nutshell. In Part I I summarized some of the differences and similarities between Jungian psychology and psychosynthesis. In this part, I reflect on the relationship between these two great geniuses. In Part III, I will offfer some of my own reflections on Jung’s concepts, which were often confirmed by Assagioli’s personal observations.


Roberto Assagioli (1888-1974), the founder of psychosynthesis, and Carl Gustav Jung (1875–1961), the founder of analytical psychology (also referred to as Jungian psychology), knew each other early in their careers. The two young men (Assagioli was Jung’s junior by 13 years) probably first met in 1907, when Assagioli was spending time at the Psychiatric Clinic at Burghölzli, University of Zürich. While studying in Zürich, Assagioli came into contact with psychoanalytic theory and worked directly with Jung. In a letter to Freud, dated 13 July 1909, Jung describes Assagioli, as follows:

The birds of passage are also moving in, i.e., the people who visit one. Among them is a very pleasant and perhaps valuable acquaintance, our first Italian, a Dr. Assagioli from the psychiatric clinic in Florence. Prof. Tanzi assigned him our work for a dissertation. The young man is very intelligent, seems to be extremely knowledgeable and is an enthusiastic follower, who is entering the new territory with the proper brio.

Figure 2 Jung_1910-rotated
Carl Gustav Jung around the time he met Assagioli. They both attended the Clinic at Burghölzi, pictured behind.

Along with twenty other doctors, Assagioli participated (as an outside guest) in the “Freud Society,” newly founded in 1907 by Jung, who at the time was an assistant physician under Eugen Bleuler. Sometime around 1910, Bleuler began holding meetings of what was loosely called the “study group for doctors interested in Freudian ideas,” and we can assume Assagioli attended these meetings.

Assagioli later wrote about meeting with Jung at his villa in Küssnacht, during which they had “animated conversations” in Jung’s study, which Assagioli noted was full of books and curious exotic objects. In a 1971 interview, Assagioli said:

My relationship with Jung took place years later [after 1914] when he had published something of his own. Then I went to see him in Zurich at his place, several times, one year off and one year on. We had very good contacts, He was a delightful man, also interested in Eastern things, and he was also a book fiend, as was I.

A Taste of Jung and Assagioli Correspondence

While the two men would meet over the years, it seems that Assagioli was always the one to travel to Zurich. Jung choose never to visit Rome during his lifetime and, to the best of my knowledge, it doesn’t seem he ever spent time in Florence. However, the two did exchange letters, in which Assagioli addressed Jung as “Trѐs honoré et cher Confrѐre” (Very honored and dear colleague) and “Illustre e caro collega” (Illustrious and dear colleague).

Here are two interesting exchanges between them that occurred after World War II.

Assagioli asks Jung for a reference

In a letter dated January 16, 1946, Assagioli first thanks Jung for his welcome when Assagioli stopped by for a visit in 1939 before the war while on his way back from England to Rome. He asks Jung for a “small favor,” asking for his help in providing a reference for Assagioli to enter Switzerland. Assagioli’s son Ilario, who was suffering with a serious case of pulmonary tuberculosis, had a chance to receive a special six-month cure at the University Sanatorium of Leysin along with twenty other Italian students. As a medical doctor, Assagioli hoped to accompany his son and the entire group of students, but needed a reference from a “notable Swiss citizen.” He wrote, with a touch of humor:

“So I have taken it upon myself to give your name, and if you are asked about me, I hope you will say that I am not an ‘undesirable’ guest for a short stay in Switzerland!”

Assagioli then complimented Jung, saying how much he has always followed Jung’s publications which he greatly admired and appreciated. Upon his arrival to Switzerland, Assagioli wrote how he hoped to acquire what Jung has published during the war years. He then signed the letter, “Your devotee.”

The Grand Hotel at Leysin, Switzerland.

Jung responded with a brief reply in French. He first thanked Assagioli, whom he addressed as “Sir and dear Colleague,” for the news Assagioli had sent to all his acquaintances soon after the war ended about his time in Regina Coeli prison and in hiding. Jung was happy to learn that Assagioli and his family “survived the disaster” of World War II. “I’ve often wondered,” Jung wrote, “what your destiny might have been over the last few years.”

In response to Assagioli’s request for a reference, Jung then wrote:

“It goes without saying that I’ll be happy to serve as a reference for you and to give you all the information and recommendations you need to make your entry into Switzerland as easy as possible.”

Arranging a rendezvous

It is not clear if Assagioli and Ilario were able to go the University Sanatorium of Leysin that year. However, in August 1948, Assagioli wrote again to Jung. He was spending time in Switzerland at the Monthey Hospital where Ilario was receiving treatment, and Assagioli asked if he and his friend the Duke of San Clemente might visit Jung. Assagioli wrote: “I would give me great pleasure if we could meet after all these years (and what years!)” Jung’s secretary wrote back immediately saying that Jung would be very happy to meet them both, but he wasn’t feeling well of late and could Assagioli please call first before arriving to ensure that Jung would be well enough to receive them.

Friends, Colleagues, or … ?

Most biographies that include an exploration of Assagioli’s relationship with Jung paint a positive, friendly, and long-term relationship between them. However, only a nominal amount of documentation is available to assert this claim.

According to his biographer Deirdre Bair, Jung apparently had a history of not having long-lasting male friendships and noted him saying on numerous occasions that men in psychology “always need to best other men.” Maria-Louise von Franz said that Jung actually got on better with men who were in another field, such as writers and artists, rather than those in psychology.

Meeting in of psychoanalysts (undated). Jung is circled and Freud is to his right. Assagioli is not present. Front row, left to right: Franz Boas, E.B. Titchener, William James, William Stern, Leo Burgerstein, G. Stanley Hall, Sigmund Freud, Carl G. Jung, Adolf Meyer, H.S. Jennings. Second row: C.E. Seashore, Joseph Jastrow, J. McK. Cattell, E.F. Buchner, E. Katzenellenbogen, Ernest Jones, A.A. Brill, Wm. H. Burnham, A.F. Chamberlain. Third row: Albert Schinz, J.A. Magni, B.T. Baldwin, F. Lyman Wells, G.M. Forbes, E.A. Kirkpatrick, Sandor Ferenczi, E.C. Sanford, J.P. Porter, Sakyo Kanda, Hikoso Kaksie. Fourth row: G.E. Dawson, S.P. Hayes, E.B. Holt, C.S. Berry, G.M. Whipple, Frank Drew, J.W. A. Young, L.N. Wilson, K.J. Karlson, H.H. Goddard, H.I. Klopp, S.C. Fuller

Such competition might have also existed between the two men, at least on the part of Jung. There is evidence of this in Hahl’s historical account of Eranos, the center in Ascona, Switzerland, sponsored by Olga Fröbe-Kapteyn (1888-1962) as “meeting place between East and West.” According to Hahl, Fröbe sent a letter of invitation to Jung but he initially declined because of her close connection to the Theosophical Movement and to Assagioli who was associated with Alice Bailey. Jung only came to Eranos to lecture in 1933 once Bailey and Assagioli were no longer attending the Eranos Tagung.

We can also see Assagioli’s unmitigated opinion of Jung’s work from his following notes:

Lack of clarity, uncertainty, confusion between the various aspects and levels of the unconscious; lack of a real spiritual experience and therefore a nebulous and defective conception of spirit; lack of any social aspect or inter-individual psychosynthesis; lack of any understanding of the role of action in psychosynthesis and lack of appreciation and utilization of the will and therefore of discipline, form and self-restraint.

(Assagioli as cited by Vanni & Rosselli, 2014, p. 26)

Both Men have Near-death Experiences

One thing that struck me while doing the research for this article is that both Assagioli and Jung had near-death experiences. Jung had a heart attack when he was 69 years old, and he describes the visions he had while he “hung on the edge of death” in his autobiography Memories, Dreams, and Reflections. In the end he envisioned his doctor standing before him telling him that he “had no right to leave the earth and must return.” Gary Lachman claims that after this experience Jung realized that he had to start revealing the paranormal and esoteric influences in his life and work.

At the age of 77, Assagioli was undergoing prostrate surgery when complications occurred and he too was on the edge of dying. Afterwards and once recovered, Assagioli said that “they have kicked me back”. Soon afterwards, his first book was published in the United States, Psychosynthesis – A Manual of Principles and Techniques, and psychosynthesis began to spread worldwide.

Final Words

I will leave the final words to Sergio Bartoli, who was one of Assagioli’s close collaborators. Bartoli told how he once knew psychoanalyst from Milan who studied directly under Jung and for a while was also one of Assagioli’s collaborators. When this person was asked about the difference between the two men, she responded by saying:

“Jung was a man who was intelligent, charming, and very likable. Assagioli was a guru.”


Click here to read the full article “Psychosynthesis and Jung in a Nutshell“.

Click here to read a series on Jung and Assagioli being published by the Psychosynthesis Trust.


References

Assagioli, R. (n.d.) Archivio Assagioli – Firenze, ID Doc: 1901,13546. Downloaded from archivioassagioli.org.

Assagioli, R. (1946). Letter to C. Jung dated 18 January 1946. Zürich ETH-Bibliothek, Wissenschaftliche Sammlungen [The Zurich ETH Library, Scientific Collection].

Assagioli, R. (1948). Letter to C. Jung dated 9 August 1948. Zürich ETH-Bibliothek, Wissenschaftliche Sammlungen [The Zurich ETH Library, Scientific Collection].

Bair, D. (2003). Jung: A Biography. New York: Little, Brown, and Company.

Giovetti, P. (1995). Roberto Assagioli: La vita e l’opera del fondatore della Psicosintesi [Roberto Assagioli: The life and work of the founder of Psychosynthesis]. Edizione Mediterranee, Roma.

Hahl, H. T. (2013). Eranos: An Alternative Intellectual History of the Twentieth Century. New York: Routledge.

Jung, C. G. (1946). Letter to R. Assagioli dated 1 March 1946. Zürich ETH-Bibliothek, Wissenschaftliche Sammlungen [The Zurich ETH Library, Scientific Collection].

Jung, C. G. (1948). Letter to R. Assagioli dated 10 August 1948. Zürich ETH-Bibliothek, Wissenschaftliche Sammlungen [The Zurich ETH Library, Scientific Collection].

Jung, C. G. (1989). Memories, Dreams, Reflections, A. Jaffé, ed. (R. Winston and C. Winston, trans.). New York: Vintage Books.

Lachman, G., (2010). Jung the mystic. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penquin.

McGuire, W. (ed.), 1974. The Freud/Jung letters: The correspondence between Sigmund Freud and C.G. Jung. London, UK: The Hogarth Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Rosselli, M. (2012). Roberto Assagioli: A bright star.” International Journal of Psychotherapy, 16(2), 7-19.

Rosselli, M. & Vanni, D. (2014). Roberto Assagioli and Carl Gustav Jung, The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 46:1, pp. 7-34.

von Franz, M-L. (1977). “Marie Louise von Franz – Jung’s Genius Made Men Jealous”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_CKSnCYLQo